On
 28 February 2013, the Parliament of the Republic of Tajikistan enacted 
the Law “On the Investment Agreement”. The Law was signed by the 
President on 14 March 2013. The Law provides for rules on investment 
contracts between the Government of Tajikistan and investors for 
investment projects of a “strategic” character. Such contracts are to be
 signed by the Government of the Republic of Tajikistan and ratified by 
the Parliament (Art. 12 and 13 respectively). The contract may establish
 rules, which are not provided for under the legislation of Tajikistan, 
as well as a strong grandfathering clause (Art. 6 sec. 3 of the Law). The ratification of such contracts by the Parliament
 elevates the special contractual regime to the level of formal 
legislation with a character of lex specialis. The Law
 foresees the possibility to agree on a very broad arbitration clause 
covering all disputes out of the investment contract, also in public 
matters (Art. 21 Sec. 2 of the Law). Tajikistan can give its consent to 
waive its state immunity including immunity against enforcement of arbitral awards. 
The
 above-mentioned provisions are just examples from a long list of 
concessions made by Tajikistan to investors. Legislation providing for 
the internationalization of contracts, restrictions on sovereign rights 
and state immunity waivers was typical for the investment legislation of
 developing countries in the 1960-70s (e.g. Indonesia) and also for some
 post-Soviet countries in the early 1990s (e.g. Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan).
 The experience of these countries shows that extensive restrictions of 
sovereign rights very often sooner or later lead to disputes with 
investors. The State needs at least the right to react to changes of 
external circumstances and to adapt its legal framework. Investors are 
often not interested in such amendments and make use of the rights given
 to them by the State (e.g. under the grandfather clause). 
The
 above-mentioned Law was drafted with the support of the International 
Finance Corporation. Probably many other international experts and 
organizations (e.g. UNCTAD) would advise Tajikistan to drop or at least 
to amend some of the provisions of this Law. 
 
